By Steven L. Taylor, Matthew S. Shugart, Arend Lijphart, Bernard Grofman
4 individual students in political technological know-how learn American democracy from a comparative viewpoint, exploring how the U.S. political process differs from that of thirty different democracies and what these transformations finally suggest for democratic functionality. This crucial textual content techniques the subsequent associations from a political engineering perspective: constitutions, electoral structures, and political events, in addition to legislative, govt, and judicial energy. The textual content seems to be at democracies from world wide over a two-decade time-frame. the result's not just a clean view of the much-discussed subject of yankee exceptionalism but additionally an leading edge method of comparative politics that treats the USA as yet one case between many. a fantastic textbook for either American and comparative politics classes.
Read or Download A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective PDF
Best comparative politics books
This publication presents a transparent and obtainable account of political and fiscal improvement in Pacific Asia. Adopting a comparative and historic process, it examines the criteria in the back of the 'East Asian Miracle' which has remodeled the economies and societies of South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia.
Such a lot democratic voters this day are distrustful of politicians, political events, and political associations. the place as soon as democracies anticipated an allegiant public, voters now query the very pillars of consultant democracy. Democratic demanding situations, Democratic offerings records the erosion of political aid in almost all complex business democracies.
Governing Europe is the 1st booklet to systematically hyperlink Michel Foucault's hypotheses on strength and 'governmentality' with the examine of eu integration. via a sequence of empirical encounters that spans the fifty-year historical past of eu integration, it explores either the various political desires that experience framed ability and ends of integration and the political applied sciences that experience made 'Europe' a calculable, administrable area.
Confronted with finances difficulties and an getting older inhabitants, eu governments lately have began reconsidering the constitution and volume of the welfare country. promises and directives have given option to obligations and selection. This quantity analyzes the influence of this modification at the voters of Germany, Finland, Norway, the Netherlands, France, Italy and the uk.
- Political Economy of the Welfare State in Latin America: Globalization, Democracy, and Development
- Introduction to Comparative Politics: The State and its Challenges
- Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy
- Negotiating Change: The New Politics of the Middle East (Library of Modern Middle East Studies)
Additional info for A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective
The institutions’ form and function will, in general, reflect the nature of the cooperation problem. N of actors This argument is derived from the RDII project. 45 Moreover, when institutions operate on the consensus principle, as opposed to majority voting, a larger group will find it difficult not only to achieve agreement, but also face a greater risk that any agreement be diluted by the “lowest common denominator” problem. On the other hand, social influence theory suggests that when it comes to putting social pressure on actors to cooperate, a larger group might be better since there are greater status rewards and punishments at stake for any particular actor.
Alastair Iain Johnston, “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,” International Studies Quarterly, 45:4 (December 2001), pp. 487–516. 22 Crafting Cooperation the number of actors allowed to participate. How inclusive or exclusive is the institution? Scope refers to the range of issues that the institution is designed to handle. The scope could be narrow, broad, intrusive, or nonintrusive. Formal rules refers to the explicit and “legalized” regulations governing how decisions are made.
Jeffrey Checkel, “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,” International Organization, 55:3 (Summer 2001), pp. 553–88. Alastair Iain Johnston, “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,” International Studies Quarterly, 45:4 (December 2001), pp. 487–516. 22 Crafting Cooperation the number of actors allowed to participate. How inclusive or exclusive is the institution? Scope refers to the range of issues that the institution is designed to handle. The scope could be narrow, broad, intrusive, or nonintrusive.